Does Stronger Corporate Governance Improve Financial Reporting Quality? Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Analysis of Shareholder-Sponsored Governance Proposals
نویسندگان
چکیده
This study examines whether stronger corporate governance leads to higher quality financial reporting. We use a regression discontinuity method to analyze the effect on financial reporting quality of shareholder-sponsored governance proposals that pass or fail by a small margin of votes in annual meetings. This empirical strategy allows us to overcome the endogeneity problem of governance mechanisms and provide evidence on the causal effect of corporate governance on financial reporting quality. We find that passing proposals related to board of directors and executive compensation leads to an improvement in the quality of financial reporting. We also find that this positive effect on financial reporting is more pronounced for firms with lower quality financial reporting prior to the voting. We find no evidence that passing proposals related to antitakeover provisions affects financial reporting quality. Preliminary draft Please do not cite or quote. Comments welcome.
منابع مشابه
Does Better Corporate Governance Improve Financial Reporting Quality? Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Analysis of Shareholder-Sponsored Governance Proposals
This study examines whether improvements in corporate governance lead to higher quality financial reporting. We use a regression discontinuity method to analyze the effect on financial reporting quality of shareholder-sponsored governance proposals that pass or fail by a small margin of votes in annual meetings. This empirical strategy allows us to overcome the endogeneity problem of governance...
متن کاملProxy Access and Optimal Standardization in Corporate Governance: An Empirical Analysis
According to the conventional wisdom, “one size does not fit all” in corporate governance. Firms are heterogeneous with respect to their governance needs, implying that the optimal corporate governance structure must also vary from firm to firm. This one-size-does-not-fit-all axiom has featured prominently in arguments against numerous corporate law regulatory initiatives, including the SEC’s f...
متن کاملFinancial Reporting Delay and Investors Behavior: Evidence From Tunisia
This study empirically investigates the relationship between the timeliness of the financial reporting and the corporate governance proxies for companies listed on the Tunisian stock exchange during 2009.It investigates the role of the corporate governance mechanisms on the timeliness of corporate financial reporting besides; it investigates the relationship between the company size, leverage, ...
متن کاملThe Impact of Corporate Governance on Internet Financial Reporting
This study investigates the effect of corporate governance mechanisms on Internet financial reporting (IFR) behavior. We rely upon agency theory to predict an association between the extent of a firm’s Internet disclosure behavior and its corporate governance structures. We measure corporate governance by shareholder rights, ownership structure, and board composition. We develop a disclosure in...
متن کاملState-Owned Enterprises and Corporate Governance Strength: Evidence from Indonesia
Background: This study investigates whether state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in Indonesia implement stronger corporate governance than do non-SOEs. It can be argued that as a large dedicated institutional investor, the Indonesian government has an incentive to strengthen corporate governance in SOEs and possesses the ability to bear the cost of implementing stronger governance. Research Methods: ...
متن کامل